The personal tutor meeting went well. We discussed a few queries I had, which were answered nicely. We also discussed the modules that we had next year and even showed me some practical work we would be participating in next year, which I am looking forward to.
The tutor meeting was a useful experience for two reasons. I was able to get to know my personal tutor a little better, and also clear up any problems I was having. A tutor meeting may be useful again later on in the year when I may have more queries, which of course I can book if I need to.
Friday, 11 December 2009
Having a Mentor
I found having a mentor very useful. My mentor did not have a technical background but had already finished a degree. This helped me as I could draw on her experience to help with my assignment. My mentor gave me advice on what I could do better and where I was going wrong.
It is useful to have more than one mentor. A range of different viewpoints is always useful when reading assignments as different people look for different things. All these views combined make for a thorough check.
Having acted as a mentor for someone else I appreciate the time it takes to read over and check work, which can be very time consuming with long essays. I am very grateful to those who acted as my mentor especially those with full time jobs.
It is useful to have more than one mentor. A range of different viewpoints is always useful when reading assignments as different people look for different things. All these views combined make for a thorough check.
Having acted as a mentor for someone else I appreciate the time it takes to read over and check work, which can be very time consuming with long essays. I am very grateful to those who acted as my mentor especially those with full time jobs.
Friday, 4 December 2009
Presentation Review
The presentation went well over all. Our main aim was to keep it interesting and keep our audiences attention. I think our main goal was achieved very successfully and we received some kind words from Jo after our presentation.
On a personal level I kept within my time limit, I didn’t really have much choice but to keep to it as I pre-timed my slides to change automatically. In retrospect this added more pressure on getting the speech across to the audience whilst also keeping in time, along with extreme nerves. But I feel it was fairly successful.
I only had a few key words for my speech in front of me. This worked well as I was aiming for a natural flow to the presentation, but also added to the pressure of getting it correct with little to fall back on if it went pear shaped, thankfully it didn’t.
If I was to redo the presentation I would probably not have the slides self timed. I would also try to practice more in front of larger audiences in an effort to reduce nerves on the day.
As a group everybody designed their own slideshow, along with their speeches. This was successful as each individual felt comfortable with what they were presenting and saying. On the day the team did an excellent job, nobody forgot their speech and everyone presented clearly.
On a personal level I kept within my time limit, I didn’t really have much choice but to keep to it as I pre-timed my slides to change automatically. In retrospect this added more pressure on getting the speech across to the audience whilst also keeping in time, along with extreme nerves. But I feel it was fairly successful.
I only had a few key words for my speech in front of me. This worked well as I was aiming for a natural flow to the presentation, but also added to the pressure of getting it correct with little to fall back on if it went pear shaped, thankfully it didn’t.
If I was to redo the presentation I would probably not have the slides self timed. I would also try to practice more in front of larger audiences in an effort to reduce nerves on the day.
As a group everybody designed their own slideshow, along with their speeches. This was successful as each individual felt comfortable with what they were presenting and saying. On the day the team did an excellent job, nobody forgot their speech and everyone presented clearly.
Meeting Minutes
Attended: Anna Lapo, Samera Jayaratne, Tristan Wahl, Helen Son, Madjosi Da Silva
Outcome:
All must research chosen products.
Find quality images for use.
Remember to reference images and research.
Come to next scheduled meeting.
Outcome:
All must research chosen products.
Find quality images for use.
Remember to reference images and research.
Come to next scheduled meeting.
Abstract, Introduction and Conclusion
Abstract:
Mobile phones have been a part of our life for decades and have found uses that they were never intended for by the creators. They have found their way into many different aspects of life including home, social, work and education. Some say the mobile phone has a positive effect, some say otherwise. This report will look at the arguments for and against these theories, conduct research into the feelings of those around us, compare the results and finally state the findings and recommendations.
Introduction:
This essay will look into the effect that mobile phones have had on society and compare the positive and negative effects to get an understanding of whether they have pushed society in the right direction or if they are leading the new e-generation into a dark hole of despair. To get a better insight as to what extent the mobile phone has affected us, the effects that were brought about by the original introduction of the telephone will briefly be looked into.
Back in the seventeenth century if one wanted to contact another outside of travelling distance they would have relied on the postal service; a slow and possibly unreliable method where a handwritten letter would be put in an envelope and physically taken by hand to where ever the letter was addressed. If you were well off maybe a telegram, a slightly faster service but possibly too expensive for the working class. Now days this method of person to person, non commercial contact is all but going extinct (let alone the hand written bit). The option of sending a letter is not comparable to the convenience, cost, speed and reliability of other methods available in the world of today.
During the eighteenth century there was a lot of development in the communications industry, more specifically in the telecommunications industry. The telephone worked its way into society and a new method of mass communication was born. With one million four hundred thousand telephones around at the beginning of the eighteenth century people were able to pick up the ear piece, dial a number (most likely using a rotary dial system) and speak to another as though they were next to each other (Russell, 200?). Granted the quality was at first poor, and maybe the equipment was a little expensive but the business boomed. People could now telephone friends and loved ones, news would travel further and faster than ever before, business could now spread out, as quick reliable communication was achievable. Now, fast forward about seventy three years and a revolution is in the mist with the introduction of the first ‘mobile’ phone, the Motorola DynaTAC. The background of which was brought into reality and practicality by Joel Engel and Richard Frenkiel (Ament, 2006).
Heading now to the 1990’s the second generation mobile phones were introduced and now another method of communication was born, maybe one which has far more impact and relevance in society today than would have been imagined at its conception, the text message. At this point people can call or text anyone with a mobile phone, anywhere (as long as they were in a network covered area). So considering the mobile phone is just an extension of the telephone, a revolutionary communications device that made business and family life easier than ever, how would this new technology affect society in years to come?
Conclusion:
In conclusion mobile phones have had a big impact on society. Mobile phones have diffused into all age groups and cultures. These devices, originally designed as an extension of the telephone, have evolved to encompass new uses and now even have their own language which again is adopted by people of all age groups, not only youths. Mobile phones have found themselves useful in all walks of life, some would even say starting to encroach and have a negative impact on life. The findings of this report show that the opinion of many is very negative on the effect of mobile phones in education. The report also confirms that health warnings on mobile phones do little to change the way people use their mobile phone probably due to not enough research available to say mobile phones have a negative effect on health. The mobile phone does appear to be having a good impact on family and social life as people can keep in contact which surely is only a good thing.
Mobile phones have been a part of our life for decades and have found uses that they were never intended for by the creators. They have found their way into many different aspects of life including home, social, work and education. Some say the mobile phone has a positive effect, some say otherwise. This report will look at the arguments for and against these theories, conduct research into the feelings of those around us, compare the results and finally state the findings and recommendations.
Introduction:
This essay will look into the effect that mobile phones have had on society and compare the positive and negative effects to get an understanding of whether they have pushed society in the right direction or if they are leading the new e-generation into a dark hole of despair. To get a better insight as to what extent the mobile phone has affected us, the effects that were brought about by the original introduction of the telephone will briefly be looked into.
Back in the seventeenth century if one wanted to contact another outside of travelling distance they would have relied on the postal service; a slow and possibly unreliable method where a handwritten letter would be put in an envelope and physically taken by hand to where ever the letter was addressed. If you were well off maybe a telegram, a slightly faster service but possibly too expensive for the working class. Now days this method of person to person, non commercial contact is all but going extinct (let alone the hand written bit). The option of sending a letter is not comparable to the convenience, cost, speed and reliability of other methods available in the world of today.
During the eighteenth century there was a lot of development in the communications industry, more specifically in the telecommunications industry. The telephone worked its way into society and a new method of mass communication was born. With one million four hundred thousand telephones around at the beginning of the eighteenth century people were able to pick up the ear piece, dial a number (most likely using a rotary dial system) and speak to another as though they were next to each other (Russell, 200?). Granted the quality was at first poor, and maybe the equipment was a little expensive but the business boomed. People could now telephone friends and loved ones, news would travel further and faster than ever before, business could now spread out, as quick reliable communication was achievable. Now, fast forward about seventy three years and a revolution is in the mist with the introduction of the first ‘mobile’ phone, the Motorola DynaTAC. The background of which was brought into reality and practicality by Joel Engel and Richard Frenkiel (Ament, 2006).
Heading now to the 1990’s the second generation mobile phones were introduced and now another method of communication was born, maybe one which has far more impact and relevance in society today than would have been imagined at its conception, the text message. At this point people can call or text anyone with a mobile phone, anywhere (as long as they were in a network covered area). So considering the mobile phone is just an extension of the telephone, a revolutionary communications device that made business and family life easier than ever, how would this new technology affect society in years to come?
Conclusion:
In conclusion mobile phones have had a big impact on society. Mobile phones have diffused into all age groups and cultures. These devices, originally designed as an extension of the telephone, have evolved to encompass new uses and now even have their own language which again is adopted by people of all age groups, not only youths. Mobile phones have found themselves useful in all walks of life, some would even say starting to encroach and have a negative impact on life. The findings of this report show that the opinion of many is very negative on the effect of mobile phones in education. The report also confirms that health warnings on mobile phones do little to change the way people use their mobile phone probably due to not enough research available to say mobile phones have a negative effect on health. The mobile phone does appear to be having a good impact on family and social life as people can keep in contact which surely is only a good thing.
Evaluation Of Results
The questionnaire results show that mobile phones have diffused into the culture of most age ranges with 96.6% of volunteers owning a mobile phone, the percentage of those volunteers in each age range can be seen from the results section.
The questionnaire agrees to a large extent with Aykac 2008 that mobile phones are viewed as having a negative impact on children in the education system, 83% of volunteers having this view, and disagrees with Castells theory that mobile phones and the text language sparks creativity. However the survey shows that the abbreviated text language has had a huge impact on society with 60% of volunteers using such a language, this is almost double that of non users of the text language.
The questionnaire agrees with the findings of Ofcom in that although 83.3% of volunteers were aware of the health issues only 16.7% were inclined to change the way they used their mobile phone, suggesting that there is not enough evidence to prove mobile phones are actually bad for your health. Mobile phone masts themselves were only a cause for concern for one third of the volunteers suggesting evidence contrary to the findings of Hale, Poulter and Whiteside that children in schools were at risk from the harmful effects of radiation from phone masts.
When investigating the uses of mobile phones it can be seen that only 7% of volunteers use their phone for work contrary to the theory of Chelsey that mobile phones have encouraged the spill over of work and home life. The survey shows that the primary use of mobile phones is for social purposes with 60%, family coming in second with 30%.
The questionnaire agrees to a large extent with Aykac 2008 that mobile phones are viewed as having a negative impact on children in the education system, 83% of volunteers having this view, and disagrees with Castells theory that mobile phones and the text language sparks creativity. However the survey shows that the abbreviated text language has had a huge impact on society with 60% of volunteers using such a language, this is almost double that of non users of the text language.
The questionnaire agrees with the findings of Ofcom in that although 83.3% of volunteers were aware of the health issues only 16.7% were inclined to change the way they used their mobile phone, suggesting that there is not enough evidence to prove mobile phones are actually bad for your health. Mobile phone masts themselves were only a cause for concern for one third of the volunteers suggesting evidence contrary to the findings of Hale, Poulter and Whiteside that children in schools were at risk from the harmful effects of radiation from phone masts.
When investigating the uses of mobile phones it can be seen that only 7% of volunteers use their phone for work contrary to the theory of Chelsey that mobile phones have encouraged the spill over of work and home life. The survey shows that the primary use of mobile phones is for social purposes with 60%, family coming in second with 30%.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)